Economisti

51% (Rischio Moderato)

Rischio Moderato (41-60%): Le professioni con un rischio moderato di automazione coinvolgono solitamente compiti di routine, ma richiedono ancora un certo giudizio umano e interazione.

Ulteriori informazioni su cosa sia questo punteggio e su come viene calcolato sono disponibili qui.

Sondaggio degli utenti

Sentimento

Il seguente grafico è incluso ovunque ci sia una quantità sostanziale di voti per rendere i dati significativi. Queste rappresentazioni visive mostrano i risultati dei sondaggi degli utenti nel tempo, fornendo un'indicazione significativa delle tendenze di sentimento.

Salari

Molto ben retribuito rispetto ad altre professioni

Nel 2023, il salario annuo mediano per 'Economists' era di 115.730 $, o 55 $ all'ora.

'Economists' hanno ricevuto un salario 140,8% superiore al salario mediano nazionale, che si attestava a 48.060 $

Salari nel tempo

Commenti

Leave a comment

Jesus told me to own a gun (Molto probabile) 12 months ago

economics is renowned for it's extremely poor level of accuracy due to economists ideological cognitive dissonance. AI will easily replace the industry with higher levels of accuracy and improved reaction time to problematic variables.

1 0 Reply

the truth (Molto probabile) 1 year ago

economists are inherently flawed in their predictions and prescriptions as they lack insight in sciences such as sociology, social policy etc.

they consistantly display an inability to model any form of human behaviour and the lack of these variables in their data have lead to perpetual disaterous global economic crashes.

AI will doubtless surpass human economists in the very short term and as a result, large, medium and even small business will dispence with the need for any form of human based economic processes which offer very little financial return for the cost incurred.

1 0 Reply

Carlos Plácido Teixeira (Moderato) 3 years ago

The profession is full of routines in its analytical processes. Already today, recommendations for the best investments in bonds and stocks are starting to be made by artificial intelligence systems. If professionals insist on exclusively using econometric tools, then the probability tends to be even greater.

0 0 Reply

Miguel Villavicencio (Basso) 3 years ago

As long as human interests define human decisions, economists will have an organic field.

1 0 Reply

Faisal Ali Al Zahrani 3 years ago

There is no chance for Economists to run outta of jobs?!!

Cause economists are indeed in demand in "High Demand" and economists are aware of automations and risk of losing jobs.

So how the heck you would want a machine to take over the job?? Without human economists our economy will be unstable and not accurate at all.

We need human economists not "machines". Economists are highly important it's our society our life we couldn't live without it.

We don't expect businesses to fail we need to accommodate that.

0 0 Reply

Preto 5 months ago

Finally somoene that actually understands what economy really is

0 0 Reply

Teg (Molto probabile) 3 years ago

Society will reach a steady state where economic policy will be easily automated

0 0 Reply

Chris (Nessuna possibilità) 3 years ago

Requires outside the box thinking that can't be programmed into a robot

0 0 Reply

Yehuda Porath (Basso) 4 years ago

I'm an economist. Our "science" is made up of many things. Some of it, like the statistical work and data collection and processing, seems fairly roboticizable.

Much of the rest - The interpretations, the use of theory to explain results, figuring out why the theory often doesn't carry over to the real world, understanding the human behavior behind complex systems of humans messing things up together, figuring out why This Time Is (or isn't) Different - all this requires a great deal of intuition, persuasion, creativity, and intuitive leaps, in addition to the knowledge, information, data, and models we learn.

It doesn't at this time appear that we'll get AI that good within 2 decades. I suppose it's possible, we could hit the Singularity, but I doubt it in that time frame

0 0 Reply

Phillip Tussing 4 years ago

Ha ha ha! OF COURSE economists will not be replaced! As Ludwig von Mises might say, it is impossible to "do economics" without humans. Ah, but teaching undergraduate economics can be done by pre-recorded videos, with grading done simply and automatically, and supervised by a few economists. And of course all the number-crunching required for corporate economics can be done by algorithms, supervised by a few human economists. And almost all the number-crunching in research work can be done by programs overseen by a few research economists. So... there will still be a few economics jobs...

0 0 Reply

rle (Molto probabile) 4 years ago

If economist continue to create use regression analysis only looking at prior data then yes, there is no need to pay an analyst 100K to click a button anyone can do in excel. I've worked to automate these roles & actuarial positions.

0 0 Reply

Tom 3 years ago

It doesn't sound like you know what actuaries (and possibly economists) do. The spreadsheets full of calculations are a tool, not the product. The work you're describing is mostly done by uncredentialed junior "actuarial analysts" or even by interns.

0 0 Reply

Lol (No chance) 4 years ago

The automation of analysis and modeling is a great and useful tool for economists (and actuaries). However, as time goes on, there is exponentially more "prior data" you were using with your automation. As new data is generated every day, we are constantly analyzing it to improve both the assumptions on which we base our models and our modeling techniques themselves.

I agree with you that the field will become automated, but not in the way that you mean it: as a one-time formula where you click a button and "the answer" is computed. Because economics (and actuarial science) are far from being fully understood. Likewise, their models are far from perfect at generating an ideal solution. To achieve a perfect model, all relevant pieces of information regarding how every individual human will make every future decision must be known (which is impossible), but because we have more data and analysis tools every day, the practice of studying economics will continue to be a valuable and profitable area of expertise.
Automation does not mean extinction!!!!

0 0 Reply

Niko (Nessuna possibilità) 4 years ago

The insights change as macro fundamentals change... a computer cannot understand the macro indicators, political influence, sentiment or expectations.. We still do not understand inflation

0 0 Reply

Anukul Bodile (Nessuna possibilità) 4 years ago

I would have said that AI would replace economists if all humans were this mythical being called Homo economicus, someone who has no social affinities, no lapses of judgement or hang-ups, no capacity even for thinking about anyone besides him or herself.

0 0 Reply

Nerd sry 4 years ago

Ahh yes, the assumption that humans are "rational decision-makers" in neoclassical models of economics. These optimization patterns not even close to the way our (non-robot) brains make decisions... Completely agree

0 0 Reply

Isaac Lemmen (Nessuna possibilità) 4 years ago

It is mostly politics and rhetoric

0 0 Reply

Gino (Nessuna possibilità) 4 years ago

La economia es la accion humana como diria ludwig von mises es imposible hacer economia sin humanos.

Economics is human action, as Ludwig von Mises would say, it is impossible to do economics without humans.

0 0 Reply

levi eleazar de oliveira bezerra (Basso) 5 years ago

The economics sector studies human behaviour and is not a matter of exact since it requires creativity and study of society to be able to apply the changes and for this to happen and necessary the accompaniment to the effective result.

0 0 Reply