Technologues et techniciens en radiologie

58% (Risque Modéré)

Risque Modéré (41-60%) : Les professions présentant un risque modéré d'automatisation impliquent généralement des tâches routinières mais nécessitent toujours un certain jugement et interaction humains.

Plus d'informations sur ce que représente ce score et comment il est calculé sont disponibles ici.

Sondage utilisateur

Sentiment

Le graphique suivant est inclus chaque fois qu'il y a un nombre substantiel de votes pour rendre les données significatives. Ces représentations visuelles affichent les résultats des sondages utilisateurs au fil du temps, fournissant une indication significative des tendances de sentiment.

Salaires

Hautement rémunéré par rapport à d'autres professions

En 2023, le salaire annuel médian pour 'Radiologic Technologists and Technicians' était de 73 410 $, soit 35 $ par heure.

'Radiologic Technologists and Technicians' ont été payés 52,7% de plus que le salaire médian national, qui était de 48 060 $

Salaires au fil du temps

Commentaires

Abdou abderrahman (Faible) 3 months ago

First you need to take care of patients and in accidents or having an elderly patient who doesn't know how to use technology The ai will not be suitable for job
Secondly we have kids and kids will be scared if a piece of metal tries to grab him so you need human interaction

0 0 Reply

Trevor 4 months ago

The main issue is taking an x-ray or getting a scan that is not easy to get. A lot of imaging done (mainly in hospitals over outpatient) is not perfect. Patients can not always hold still, get into position, or their condition does not allow for the intended imaging. I believe that if only technologists voted on this they would all say there is little to no chance. The people voting is likely not made of all technologist. Personally I think there is a small chance that AI could take my job. One of the newer CT scanners I use can automatically scan the patient and recon the scans with almost no input by me. But actually scanning the patient is such a small percent of what actually happens. There would need to be a major breakthrough in imaging equipment or AI in order for this to be possible.

0 0 Reply

Brandon (Faible) 1 year ago

The meticulous work done by a radiological technician is extremely difficult to replace through artificial intelligence. The reason being, the contrast in faults that could be the cause of the same problem.

Fortunately, there are also too many different makes of machines. For one robot to be programmed to fault find and fix all makes of x-ray machines is going to take at least 40 years to develop, which won't be worth an engineer's effort based on its purpose.

This job will not become redundant in the next 20 years.

0 0 Reply

Tara 1 year ago

The computerization of the images produced by xray technologists will certainly become more impressive, but you can't tell me a robot or AI understands how to get a chest xray on a kyphotic 90 year old, nor does it know how to position patients in general. This is hands-on medical care. A robot cannot help a patient that is vomiting, or put in an IV. Like nursing, the people part will remain. The rest of the tech can happily advance.

0 0 Reply

Smith (Incertain) 3 years ago

Technology might be better at noticing discrepancies compared to the normal, but the human touch will always be needed in the healthcare field to calm patients.

0 0 Reply

Avaneesh Babu 4 years ago

Radiologists do more than just read scans, they interpret and understand these x-rays and speak to patients. I know that IT is taking strands towards this level, but they cannot ever converse with humans with the same efficiency.

0 0 Reply

Evolution 4 years ago

AI is better in interpreting x-ray than human.

0 2 Reply

Adrian 3 years ago

Well that's the radiologists work, rad techs pretty much only work the modalities and patients to get a picture that the radiologist can describe.

1 0 Reply

Keiko Taisho (Faible) 4 years ago

There’s no technology for the robots to work with the patients on a personal level

1 0 Reply