مهندسو الفضاء والطيران

The engineering of this kind of stuff requires sudden changes and the human mind

Aerospace engineering requires human creativity that AI simply lacks

No way people trust building ROCKETS to A.I.S

It's almost impossible to any type of artificial intelligence to think out of the box as a human thoughts go there is no limit to human creativity but the artificial intelligence is limited even after decades..

Needs innovation and creativity

the risk of even a slight failure could prevent an ai that could replace this job from ever leaving development

Most robots are created because of it, and this work requires a lot of originality.

AI is still advancing at an alarming rate and is even capable of performing very complex mathematical calculations pertaining to the field compared to 2 years ago.

Whilst right now it can compare your suggestions on a particular design and leave you to figure out the best course of action, that itself might change in the future given how fast its reasoning is improving

The robots might be able to design the best aircraft but they can’t account for ersonal flare and other human factors like tailoring to a certain government officials tastes so you get chosen.

Engineering is a difficult job and with the precision of present machines, they could make things more accurate than human hands. The only downside is a machine/robot can't make full decisions, Humans are able to go through options and choose the best one based on circumstance. Robots can't do that... yet

It's a complex job. Many constraints need to be accounted for. A computer just may not be as good at it.

Clever minds. Aerospace engineers need to come up with clever solutions, which robots cannot (at least with today foreseen technology). Think about all different trade studies which were sometimes counter intuitive and required completely surprising and innovative solutions. This would drive robots crazy, right? Teamwork. Aerospace engineers are required to help each other during product creations, which robots can not do properly. Either you guided someone younger, or you gave a hand on CAD or FEA software tips to a bloke close to retirement. Most of the time you did not care if this person is different skin colour, religion, gender or beliefs. Well this pays off in the end. No tight space requirement. Unless you are working in a design or manufacturing sweat shop, aerospace engineers do not require squeezing into small spaces which is strong point of robotics. Negotiation. Aerospace design requires negotiation skills, robots cannot do this properly. Think about all interface and supplier and customer meetings you have ever been to. Or even meetings with different functions like manufacturing and maybe stress analysis.

cos a robot can't get right into the small parts of a helicopter (for example), and if it could it would take way to long to program

It really depends on how we see it, if we as engineers use AI to our advantage and adapt it's positives we can easily stay in the field, but if we step aside then you know what will happen eventually.
World now is not waiting for us to improve it WILL improve.

aerospace engineering is an area that needs innovation and creativity, always discovering new things and not always doing the same task, testing new materials and things that have never been used are constant tasks, etc.

I just don't think it is realistic to replace this job within the next 20 years. It seems it take at least a little longer, as this job requires extremely difficult math, and hands on experience engineering. It also requires the capable human mind. Therefore it is unlikely that this job is replaced soon.

Aerospace Engineers will not be replaced any time soon because robots and AI are not technologically advanced yet.

I know this can be said about most jobs, but I think Artificial Intelligence will be used as a tool instead of a replacement.

Airplanes or general aircraft are extremely complicated machinery that would need AI inside of the craft to be engineered. It is also extremely costly and would most likely not be able for it to be replaced.

Required novel application of physics