Dược sĩ

Rủi ro Trung bình
48%
Bạn Muốn Đi Đâu Tiếp Theo?
Chia sẻ kết quả của bạn với bạn bè và gia đình.
Hoặc, Khám Phá Nghề Nghiệp Này Chi Tiết Hơn...
NGUY CƠ TỰ ĐỘNG HÓA
ĐƯỢC TÍNH TOÁN
31%
(Rủi ro thấp)
THĂM DÒ Ý KIẾN
66%
(Rủi ro cao)
Average: 48%
Nhu cầu lao động
SỰ PHÁT TRIỂN
5,4%
vào năm 2033
LƯƠNG
136.030 $
hoặc 65,39 $ mỗi giờ
Dung tích
331.700
tính đến 2023
TÓM TẮT
ĐIỂM CÔNG VIỆC
6,2/10

Người khác cũng đã xem

Rủi ro tự động hóa đã được tính toán

31% (Rủi ro thấp)

Rủi ro thấp (21-40%): Các công việc ở mức độ này có rủi ro tự động hóa hạn chế, vì chúng đòi hỏi sự kết hợp giữa kỹ năng kỹ thuật và kỹ năng tập trung vào con người.

Thêm thông tin về điểm số này, và cách tính nó có sẵn ở đây.

Một số phẩm chất khá quan trọng của công việc khó có thể tự động hóa:

  • Hỗ trợ và Chăm sóc cho Người khác

  • Nhận thức xã hội

  • Sự Khéo Léo Của Ngón Tay

  • Khéo léo bằng tay

Cuộc thăm dò ý kiến của người dùng

66% cơ hội để tự động hóa hoàn toàn trong hai thập kỷ tới

Khách thăm trang web của chúng tôi đã bình chọn rằng có khả năng công việc này sẽ được tự động hóa. Tuy nhiên, nhân viên có thể tìm được sự yên tâm trong mức độ rủi ro tự động mà chúng tôi đã tạo ra, cho thấy có 31% khả năng tự động hóa.

Bạn nghĩ rủi ro của việc tự động hóa là gì?

Khả năng nào mà Dược sĩ sẽ bị thay thế bởi robot hoặc trí tuệ nhân tạo trong 20 năm tới?






Tình cảm

Biểu đồ sau đây được bao gồm ở bất cứ nơi nào có một lượng lớn phiếu bầu để tạo ra dữ liệu có ý nghĩa. Những biểu đồ trực quan này hiển thị kết quả thăm dò ý kiến của người dùng theo thời gian, cung cấp một chỉ báo quan trọng về xu hướng cảm xúc.

Cảm xúc theo thời gian (hàng quý)

Cảm xúc theo thời gian (hàng năm)

Sự phát triển

Tăng trưởng nhanh chóng so với các ngành nghề khác

Số lượng vị trí làm việc 'Pharmacists' dự kiến sẽ tăng 5,4% vào năm 2033

Tổng số việc làm, và dự kiến số vị trí tuyển dụng

* Dữ liệu từ Cục Thống kê Lao động cho giai đoạn từ 2021 đến 2031
Dự báo cập nhật sẽ được công bố vào 09-2024.

Lương

Được trả lương rất cao so với các ngành nghề khác

Tại 2023, mức lương hàng năm trung bình cho 'Pharmacists' là 136.030 $, hoặc 65 $ mỗi giờ

'Pharmacists' đã được trả mức lương cao hơn 183,0% so với mức lương trung bình toàn quốc, đứng ở mức 48.060 $

Lương theo thời gian

* Dữ liệu từ Cục Thống kê Lao động

Dung tích

Phạm vi cơ hội nghề nghiệp đáng kể lớn hơn so với các ngành nghề khác

Tính đến 2023, có 331.700 người được tuyển dụng làm 'Pharmacists' tại Hoa Kỳ.

Điều này đại diện cho khoảng 0,22% lực lượng lao động có việc làm trên toàn quốc

Nói cách khác, khoảng 1 trong 457 người được tuyển dụng làm 'Pharmacists'.

Mô tả công việc

Phân phối các loại thuốc được kê đơn bởi bác sĩ và các nhà thực hành y tế khác và cung cấp thông tin cho bệnh nhân về các loại thuốc và cách sử dụng chúng. Có thể tư vấn cho bác sĩ và các nhà thực hành y tế khác về việc lựa chọn, liều lượng, tương tác và tác dụng phụ của các loại thuốc.

SOC Code: 29-1051.00

Tài nguyên

Nếu bạn đang suy nghĩ về việc bắt đầu một sự nghiệp mới, hoặc tìm kiếm công việc thay đổi, chúng tôi đã tạo ra một công cụ tìm kiếm việc làm tiện lợi có thể giúp bạn giành được vị trí mới hoàn hảo.

Tìm kiếm việc làm trong khu vực địa phương của bạn

Bình luận

Leave a comment

Mo 2 months ago
The future of Retail Pharmacy, is uncertain. Prescriptions will eventually be paperless, which would be accessible via a cloud. Pharmacy warehouses or fulfillment centers would have access to these Prescriptions, and it would be processed by pharmacists with the help of AI and Robots to pick. Thus reducing the demand for walk in retail phamacies.
1 0 Reply
bob (Rất có khả năng) 3 months ago
pharmacist job is to simply check the doctors work and i feel like that would be taken over by AI or if not completely significantly reduced job market and lower salary
10 8 Reply
SomeOneWhoDoesn'tWorkAsAPharmacist (Thấp) 4 months ago
A pharmacist job is something that involves communication. A robot can mimic a human at that, but can't match it.
3 0 Reply
Liam Müller (Ôn định) 7 months ago
Clinical pharmacists face the greatest risk from the increasing presence of AI software in medication management. AI technology is advancing rapidly, offering more efficient alignment of prescribed medications with patient needs and care objectives compared to human professionals. Healthcare administrators are likely to favor AI solutions for tasks such as medication reviews, drug interactions, and dosage optimization due to their higher accuracy and speed, potentially leading to a preference for software over human pharmacists in certain aspects of pharmacy practice.

While AI is set to change the role of clinical pharmacists in medication management, it is crucial to understand that AI is not expected to entirely replace them. Instead, AI will eliminate the need for pharmacists to directly prescribe and manage medications, opening up opportunities for collaboration in validating, certifying, and overseeing AI-driven prescribing software. This collaboration will be vital for ensuring the quality, accuracy, and ethical application of AI technology in healthcare. Pharmacists who embrace new roles in a technology-driven future will thrive, using their expertise and technological skills to advocate for their continued involvement in validating and enhancing the performance of AI-driven solutions in medication management. The pharmacists who cling to the past, where the physical presence of a pharmacist was required over digital presence and technological solutions, will be the ones left behind.
14 0 Reply
Francisco Ferreira (Ôn định) 7 months ago
Physicians serve as the foremost experts in prescribing medications, due to their extensive training and expertise in diagnosing and treating medical conditions. While Nurse Practitioners, Physician Assistants, and Clinical Pharmacists have been encroaching on the Physician’s roles to include prescribing, the advent of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology promises to revolutionize the field.

AI technology offers cost-effective solutions that surpass Clinical Pharmacists in medication reviews, questioning the need for non-physician involvement in assessing patients' medication effectiveness and appropriateness. As AI becomes more integrated into healthcare, it has the potential to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of physician-led prescribing, potentially rendering roles like Clinical Pharmacists obsolete in this aspect. This shift necessitates non-physician healthcare providers to adapt to changing responsibilities, as the tasks of prescribing and evaluating medication appropriateness and effectiveness, in a healthcare setting, will no longer be within their domain.

However, AI is not expected to completely replace Clinical Pharmacists and other healthcare professionals. Instead, it will remove the necessity for these professionals to directly prescribe and review medications, creating opportunities for collaboration in validating, certifying, developing, and managing AI-driven prescribing software in healthcare settings and software companies. This collaboration is crucial for ensuring the quality and reliability of the technology, as public trust in AI outcomes will require continuous validation and certification from other healthcare professionals.

The decision on who will provide these ongoing validations, whether it will be led by nurse practitioners, physician assistants, or clinical pharmacists, remains uncertain as the healthcare landscape evolves. If none of these professions takes on this role, physicians are likely to step in, seizing the chance to further establish themselves as the most qualified authorities in medication management.
5 2 Reply
Günter Von Stein (Ôn định) 7 months ago
Physicians, in contrast to Pharmacists and certain other healthcare providers, possess the highest level of expertise in evaluating the effectiveness of medication therapy through diagnostic and physiological assessments. Given that prescribing medications is a core aspect of medical practice, it rightfully falls within the purview of Physicians due to their specialized knowledge and training.

While Nurse Practitioners, Physician Assistants, and Clinical Pharmacists have sought to expand their roles over time, the emergence of Artificial Intelligence (AI) software presents a significant shift. AI technology has the potential to disrupt this trend by offering cost-effective solutions that surpass the capabilities of Clinical Pharmacists in medication review. This development challenges the traditional arguments used to justify the involvement of non-physician providers in prescribing practices.

As AI software becomes more prevalent in healthcare, it is poised to enhance the efficiency of Physician-managed prescribing processes, potentially rendering the need for Clinical Pharmacists and other non-physician prescribers obsolete. This shift may prompt a reevaluation of the costs associated with employing these professionals outside their traditional scope. While AI is not expected to entirely replace Pharmacists and other healthcare providers, it will redirect their focus towards their core competencies, creating new opportunities for collaboration with Physicians and technology companies.

The evolving landscape of healthcare will require Pharmacists and other healthcare professionals to pivot towards roles that align with their original training, while also offering them opportunities to contribute to the development and maintenance of AI-driven prescribing software. This collaboration will be essential in ensuring the quality and reliability of these technological advancements, thereby fostering trust among the public in the outputs generated by such systems.
5 1 Reply
Daniel (Rất có khả năng) 8 months ago
most of our job is looking at LexiComp, ClinPharm, etc. for guidelines and treatment algorithms. Easily automated via a sophisticated piece of software
13 1 Reply
Zachary Rodrigues (Không chắc chắn) 8 months ago
In the future, as AI software becomes standard for healthcare professionals to access and evaluate medication therapies, there will be a shift in the role of Clinical Pharmacists. Physicians and other healthcare providers will increasingly question the necessity of Clinical Pharmacists, as they themselves can directly utilize AI tools for analyzing data.

Physicians, unlike the general public, are trained experts in diagnosing and treating patients, with prescribing medications falling within their domain rather than that of pharmacists. While pharmacists traditionally excel in reviewing medication therapies, the integration of AI in data analysis is reshaping the landscape. This technological advancement is expected to reduce the necessity for clinical pharmacists to conduct extensive reviews in clinical settings. With physicians inputting data into AI systems for analysis and interpreting the outputs themselves, there will be a significant decrease in the previous reliance on pharmacists for medication optimization assessments.

The evolving role of AI may assume tasks previously handled by Clinical Pharmacists, such as ensuring prescribed medications align with patient needs and care goals. However, Pharmacists will still play a crucial role in training, updating, and refining AI systems to adapt to changing regulations and advancements in medicine. The responsibility will increasingly fall on Informatics Pharmacists, Information Technology Pharmacists, Data Scientists, Machine Learning Engineers, and Software Engineers, rather than solely on Clinical Pharmacists.
6 0 Reply
Bill Evans (Không chắc chắn) 8 months ago
The decline of Clinical Pharmacy is on the horizon as AI advancements pose a significant threat to Clinical Pharmacists who heavily rely on algorithms for decision-making. AI's strength in algorithm-driven tasks aligns closely with the core functions of Clinical Pharmacy. It is crucial to differentiate between Clinical Pharmacists and other types of Pharmacists.

With technology playing an expanding role in the Pharmaceutical Industry, there will be a growing need for regulatory frameworks to supervise the sector. This shift will create a demand for Pharmacists specializing in Compliance and Regulatory Affairs within pharmacies. Increased site inspections will become necessary, requiring Pharmacists to intensify their monitoring efforts. Pharmacists will also face a rising burden of conducting independent assessments and detailed reporting to ensure that the technologies utilized comply with industry standards and regulations.
6 0 Reply
A.J. (Rất có khả năng) 9 months ago
A machine can count out pills. A person is NOT necessary or even preferred for such a role.
0 1 Reply
Bill Evans 8 months ago
Pharmacists are not responsible for counting pills; this task falls under the purview of Pharmacy Technicians. When dispensing medication, pharmacists use their judgment to ensure the validity of the prescribed treatment.
6 0 Reply
DS (Rất có khả năng) 10 months ago
There’s already apps out there that counts our tablets we dispense
0 1 Reply
d. mena (Rất có khả năng) 1 year ago
Ucsf already has an impressive robotic pharmacy where there’s 1 pharmacist regulating what the robots do.

They had 0% human error in the years they launched it. This is so pharmacists can do more patient care which I think is a great idea. But for those who didn’t do residency vs those that did, I’m sure employers will choose the residency trained pharm over the non residency trained pharm.

Maybe the option to not do residency will diminish in the future.

There’s already low applicants as of this year with over 90% acceptance rates. It’s crazy bc seeing how much it was in demand ten years ago.

I think sooner or later other hospitals will follow, along with other companies in terms of AI and robots. Community pharmacists will have issues in the future if robotics are indeed what companies will invest in. Invest in robotics and you won’t have to pay 130-180k for each human to do the same job. They might be highly trained, but the job used to be on the job training, used to be Bachelor level. Lots of admin work. The whole PharmD was from greedy leaders that wanted to take advantage of the loans for higher education. Sucks.
0 0 Reply
pharmacist (Không chắc chắn) 1 year ago
Pharmacist will Always have to interpretate the customer problem. I think there will be a cooperation with automation on the future
0 0 Reply
Ph. Ridha ahmed (Không có cơ hội) 1 year ago
The bigest part of my jop is hope and emotion i give to my patients that they will be fine and treated . And evaluat if any drug even if AI make will treat people suffciently and what advirse effect will make by it
1 0 Reply
Mark Kleinbeck (Rất có khả năng) 1 year ago
We use robotics to fill prescription now. The doctor can input what he wants dispensed and can discuss the effects and side effects
0 3 Reply
Sally (Rất có khả năng) 1 year ago
Prescription dispensers will become the norm. Not using human pharmacists will reduce the margin of error.
0 3 Reply
RK (Rất có khả năng) 1 year ago
Hospital systems , utilizing automated dispensing systems , are only a few steps away from literately creating a pharmacist free process. Those same systems are creeping into the retail segment removing pharmacist opportunities .
0 1 Reply
Mark (Thấp) 1 year ago
Just goes to show you the public’s true ignorance on what we actually do. Current “automation” is trash & much is highly dependent on patient information and a plethora of other variables that can change on a whim.

I really feel sad for how ignorant and out of touch with reality (oblivious of common sense) some programmers are in their confidence with automating pharmacy
2 0 Reply
Licastro 1 year ago
I'm sure you haven't considered psychological and social perspectives. No matter how advanced AI is, not everyone will trust them. I would still be careful about it. I, myself, wouldn't want to consult an AI without getting to an expert first.

If in any case, an AI becomes so advanced that it's capable of doing everything, we might as well lose all other jobs, including those in the I.T. industry and Data Science. This field is much easier for them to replicate. Just imagine an AI who can command other AI programs; it would not need many people anymore. It would only need a very few to act as their Quality Analyst or something related.

Besides, do people really think of Pharmacists only as community pharmacists? There are so many careers in this field. I'm sure an AI can't conduct its own pharmaceutical research, clinical trials, and even patient counseling. You might think, "Oh, but an AI can do the patient counseling too." I think this is also a good time for Pharmacists to level up from compounding and dispensing to counseling and focusing on clinical skills.

Also, just like what I told you, there are still so many people who prefer to talk to a human rather than an AI. I know this since I work as a Chat Support for a Telecommunications Company and believe me, they would always tell me they hated our automated system, which I think is a pretty advanced system since they can already do troubleshooting, discuss billing, and even purchase products or services through AI. However, these people still always wanted to talk to a human person no matter how many times we provide them self-service options.

If the time comes that it becomes so advanced, trust me, all existing jobs would perish and only a number of people will be left to monitor, control, and regulate these machines. I'm surprised that the majority of people who work in I.T., including Decision Science and Data Science, aren't afraid of AI and seem to think they know everything that a Pharmacist studies.

Remember, biochemical processes aren't always the same. That's why different pharmaceutical products are created just for a single illness. This is because the human body is so unique that each and every person has their own biological, physiological, and psychological reaction to drugs. We still don't fully understand cancer and other illnesses and disorders. Cells are so complicated that they can react to a single substance in a good or bad way. Certain drugs can have its own effects on the human anatomy.

I do not claim to know everything. I am not even a pharmacist. However, I studied almost 2 years of Medical Laboratory Science before I stopped due to financial issues. This is also the reason why I believe that each healthcare profession will not be removed. Instead, there will be changes with their roles and practices.

I'm certain that all professions would find its way to evolve no matter how much we rely on technology. Medicine, Nursing, Pharmacy, Psychology, and all other allied health professionals aren't just pure science. It also includes art. That's why these professions are always stated to be both science and an art. It is so much more than just theoretical concepts since it also involves practical applications.
1 0 Reply
Jiovanni (Ôn định) 1 year ago
After release of chatGPT there is nothing for sure is safe
0 0 Reply

Để lại phản hồi về nghề nghiệp này

Trang web này được bảo vệ bởi reCAPTCHA và Chính sách bảo mật cũng như Điều khoản dịch vụ của Google được áp dụng.