Dược sĩ
Người khác cũng đã xem
Rủi ro tự động hóa đã được tính toán
Rủi ro thấp (21-40%): Các công việc ở mức độ này có rủi ro tự động hóa hạn chế, vì chúng đòi hỏi sự kết hợp giữa kỹ năng kỹ thuật và kỹ năng tập trung vào con người.
Thêm thông tin về điểm số này, và cách tính nó có sẵn ở đây.
Cuộc thăm dò ý kiến của người dùng
Khách thăm trang web của chúng tôi đã bình chọn rằng có khả năng công việc này sẽ được tự động hóa. Tuy nhiên, nhân viên có thể tìm được sự yên tâm trong mức độ rủi ro tự động mà chúng tôi đã tạo ra, cho thấy có 31% khả năng tự động hóa.
Bạn nghĩ rủi ro của việc tự động hóa là gì?
Khả năng nào mà Dược sĩ sẽ bị thay thế bởi robot hoặc trí tuệ nhân tạo trong 20 năm tới?
Tình cảm
Biểu đồ sau đây được bao gồm ở bất cứ nơi nào có một lượng lớn phiếu bầu để tạo ra dữ liệu có ý nghĩa. Những biểu đồ trực quan này hiển thị kết quả thăm dò ý kiến của người dùng theo thời gian, cung cấp một chỉ báo quan trọng về xu hướng cảm xúc.
Cảm xúc theo thời gian (hàng quý)
Cảm xúc theo thời gian (hàng năm)
Sự phát triển
Số lượng vị trí làm việc 'Pharmacists' dự kiến sẽ tăng 5,4% vào năm 2033
Tổng số việc làm, và dự kiến số vị trí tuyển dụng
Dự báo cập nhật sẽ được công bố vào 09-2024.
Lương
Tại 2023, mức lương hàng năm trung bình cho 'Pharmacists' là 136.030 $, hoặc 65 $ mỗi giờ
'Pharmacists' đã được trả mức lương cao hơn 183,0% so với mức lương trung bình toàn quốc, đứng ở mức 48.060 $
Lương theo thời gian
Dung tích
Tính đến 2023, có 331.700 người được tuyển dụng làm 'Pharmacists' tại Hoa Kỳ.
Điều này đại diện cho khoảng 0,22% lực lượng lao động có việc làm trên toàn quốc
Nói cách khác, khoảng 1 trong 457 người được tuyển dụng làm 'Pharmacists'.
Mô tả công việc
Phân phối các loại thuốc được kê đơn bởi bác sĩ và các nhà thực hành y tế khác và cung cấp thông tin cho bệnh nhân về các loại thuốc và cách sử dụng chúng. Có thể tư vấn cho bác sĩ và các nhà thực hành y tế khác về việc lựa chọn, liều lượng, tương tác và tác dụng phụ của các loại thuốc.
SOC Code: 29-1051.00
Tài nguyên
Tìm kiếm việc làm trong khu vực địa phương của bạn
Nếu bạn đang suy nghĩ về việc bắt đầu một sự nghiệp mới, hoặc tìm kiếm công việc thay đổi, chúng tôi đã tạo ra một công cụ tìm kiếm việc làm tiện lợi có thể giúp bạn giành được vị trí mới hoàn hảo.
Bình luận
Leave a comment
Pharmacists in clinically-focused roles face the greatest risk of displacement, as Physicians become more efficient in patient care due to AI advancements. This increased efficiency will likely reduce the need for Pharmacists and other healthcare professionals who currently fill gaps in care.
Furthermore, the advancement of AI will enable more clinicians outside of conventional medicine to retrain as Physicians, as medical schools become more flexible, affordable, and accessible. The pathway to becoming a Physician while working as a Pharmacist could soon be realized through part-time programs delivered as a series of short-term courses, potentially completed in as little as ten years. This shift could help meet the growing demand for Primary Care Physicians, where shortages persist.
For Pharmacists who remain in the field, the practice of Pharmacy will be completely different; it will be primarily driven by those competent enough to oversee the increasing implementation of AI and robotics. As AI and robotics usage expands, there will be a significant demand for Pharmacists who understand how to manage these technologies and ensure compliance with the stringent regulations governing their use.
AI will transform the pharmacy role, but humans will always need drugs, and human beings to talk to about those drugs.
In such a scenario, pharmacists might still be employed to monitor the operations of multiple pharmacies from a remote location in the event that systems malfunction or become overloaded.
The net effect of this shift could lead to a decreased demand for pharmacists, as pharmacy technicians demonstrate superior performance when utilizing AI compared to when they are assisted by pharmacists.
To maintain their current employment levels, pharmacists must demonstrate to the public that they excel in remotely monitoring, evaluating, updating, and maintaining pharmacy AI platforms compared to other professions.
Otherwise, there won’t be any justification for hiring pharmacists at the current rate or paying them at the same salary levels, especially if they do not possess greater skills than the pharmacy technicians using these technologies.
The other assumption is that AI will continue to progress exponentially. Based on current sentiment from most of the tech field is that LLM development has recently slowed significantly from its earliest developmental explosion. It's largest wall to development right now is retaining information permanence for the purposes of building knowledge not previously trained on, and avoiding non-factual "hallucinations". These are two critical problems that have yet to see widespread or effective solutions implemented.
Try replacing healthcare providers with a robot that can't remember critical personal details correctly or does not have the intuition to even ask based on human cues or complex social history - the majority of effective patient counselling and interaction in healthcare requires these functions.
While AI is set to change the role of clinical pharmacists in medication management, it is crucial to understand that AI is not expected to entirely replace them. Instead, AI will eliminate the need for pharmacists to directly prescribe and manage medications, opening up opportunities for collaboration in validating, certifying, and overseeing AI-driven prescribing software. This collaboration will be vital for ensuring the quality, accuracy, and ethical application of AI technology in healthcare. Pharmacists who embrace new roles in a technology-driven future will thrive, using their expertise and technological skills to advocate for their continued involvement in validating and enhancing the performance of AI-driven solutions in medication management. The pharmacists who cling to the past, where the physical presence of a pharmacist was required over digital presence and technological solutions, will be the ones left behind.
AI technology offers cost-effective solutions that surpass Clinical Pharmacists in medication reviews, questioning the need for non-physician involvement in assessing patients' medication effectiveness and appropriateness. As AI becomes more integrated into healthcare, it has the potential to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of physician-led prescribing, potentially rendering roles like Clinical Pharmacists obsolete in this aspect. This shift necessitates non-physician healthcare providers to adapt to changing responsibilities, as the tasks of prescribing and evaluating medication appropriateness and effectiveness, in a healthcare setting, will no longer be within their domain.
However, AI is not expected to completely replace Clinical Pharmacists and other healthcare professionals. Instead, it will remove the necessity for these professionals to directly prescribe and review medications, creating opportunities for collaboration in validating, certifying, developing, and managing AI-driven prescribing software in healthcare settings and software companies. This collaboration is crucial for ensuring the quality and reliability of the technology, as public trust in AI outcomes will require continuous validation and certification from other healthcare professionals.
The decision on who will provide these ongoing validations, whether it will be led by nurse practitioners, physician assistants, or clinical pharmacists, remains uncertain as the healthcare landscape evolves. If none of these professions takes on this role, physicians are likely to step in, seizing the chance to further establish themselves as the most qualified authorities in medication management.
While Nurse Practitioners, Physician Assistants, and Clinical Pharmacists have sought to expand their roles over time, the emergence of Artificial Intelligence (AI) software presents a significant shift. AI technology has the potential to disrupt this trend by offering cost-effective solutions that surpass the capabilities of Clinical Pharmacists in medication review. This development challenges the traditional arguments used to justify the involvement of non-physician providers in prescribing practices.
As AI software becomes more prevalent in healthcare, it is poised to enhance the efficiency of Physician-managed prescribing processes, potentially rendering the need for Clinical Pharmacists and other non-physician prescribers obsolete. This shift may prompt a reevaluation of the costs associated with employing these professionals outside their traditional scope. While AI is not expected to entirely replace Pharmacists and other healthcare providers, it will redirect their focus towards their core competencies, creating new opportunities for collaboration with Physicians and technology companies.
The evolving landscape of healthcare will require Pharmacists and other healthcare professionals to pivot towards roles that align with their original training, while also offering them opportunities to contribute to the development and maintenance of AI-driven prescribing software. This collaboration will be essential in ensuring the quality and reliability of these technological advancements, thereby fostering trust among the public in the outputs generated by such systems.
Physicians, unlike the general public, are trained experts in diagnosing and treating patients, with prescribing medications falling within their domain rather than that of pharmacists. While pharmacists traditionally excel in reviewing medication therapies, the integration of AI in data analysis is reshaping the landscape. This technological advancement is expected to reduce the necessity for clinical pharmacists to conduct extensive reviews in clinical settings. With physicians inputting data into AI systems for analysis and interpreting the outputs themselves, there will be a significant decrease in the previous reliance on pharmacists for medication optimization assessments.
The evolving role of AI may assume tasks previously handled by Clinical Pharmacists, such as ensuring prescribed medications align with patient needs and care goals. However, Pharmacists will still play a crucial role in training, updating, and refining AI systems to adapt to changing regulations and advancements in medicine. The responsibility will increasingly fall on Informatics Pharmacists, Information Technology Pharmacists, Data Scientists, Machine Learning Engineers, and Software Engineers, rather than solely on Clinical Pharmacists.
With technology playing an expanding role in the Pharmaceutical Industry, there will be a growing need for regulatory frameworks to supervise the sector. This shift will create a demand for Pharmacists specializing in Compliance and Regulatory Affairs within pharmacies. Increased site inspections will become necessary, requiring Pharmacists to intensify their monitoring efforts. Pharmacists will also face a rising burden of conducting independent assessments and detailed reporting to ensure that the technologies utilized comply with industry standards and regulations.
They had 0% human error in the years they launched it. This is so pharmacists can do more patient care which I think is a great idea. But for those who didn’t do residency vs those that did, I’m sure employers will choose the residency trained pharm over the non residency trained pharm.
Maybe the option to not do residency will diminish in the future.
There’s already low applicants as of this year with over 90% acceptance rates. It’s crazy bc seeing how much it was in demand ten years ago.
I think sooner or later other hospitals will follow, along with other companies in terms of AI and robots. Community pharmacists will have issues in the future if robotics are indeed what companies will invest in. Invest in robotics and you won’t have to pay 130-180k for each human to do the same job. They might be highly trained, but the job used to be on the job training, used to be Bachelor level. Lots of admin work. The whole PharmD was from greedy leaders that wanted to take advantage of the loans for higher education. Sucks.
Để lại phản hồi về nghề nghiệp này