Overzicht
Automatiseringsrisico
2. Gebruikerspeiling
3. Groei
4. Loon
5. Volume
Beschrijving
Middelen
Opmerkingen

Verzekeringsverkoopagenten

Hoog Risico
69%
Waar Wilt U Hierna Heen Gaan?
Deel je resultaten met vrienden en familie.
Of, verken dit beroep in meer detail...
RISICO VAN AUTOMATISERING
BEREKEND
80%
(Onmiddellijk Risico)
PEILING
57%
(Matig Risico)
Average: 69%
VRAAG NAAR ARBEID
GROEI
6,1%
tegen het jaar 2033
LONEN
$ 59.080
of $ 28,40 per uur
Volume
457.510
vanaf 2023
SAMENVATTING
BAANSCORE
4,6/10

Mensen bekeken ook

Computerprogrammeurs
Advocaten
Accountants en Auditors
Verzekeringsacceptanten
Grafisch Ontwerpers

Berekend automatiseringsrisico

80% (Onmiddellijk Risico)

Imminent Risico (81-100%): Beroepen op dit niveau hebben een extreem hoge kans om in de nabije toekomst geautomatiseerd te worden. Deze banen bestaan voornamelijk uit repetitieve, voorspelbare taken waarbij weinig behoefte is aan menselijk oordeel.

Meer informatie over wat deze score is en hoe deze wordt berekend, is beschikbaar hier.

Enkele vrij belangrijke kwaliteiten van de baan zijn moeilijk te automatiseren:

  • Overtuiging

  • Onderhandeling

  • Sociale Waarneming

Gebruikerspeiling

57% kans op volledige automatisering binnen de komende twee decennia

Onze bezoekers hebben gestemd dat ze niet zeker weten of dit beroep zal worden geautomatiseerd. De automatiseringsrisicograad die we echter hebben gegenereerd, suggereert een veel hogere kans op automatisering: 80% kans op automatisering.

Wat denk je dat het risico van automatisering is?

Wat is de kans dat Verzekeringsverkoopagenten binnen de komende 20 jaar vervangen zal worden door robots of kunstmatige intelligentie?






Gevoel

De volgende grafiek wordt opgenomen waar er een aanzienlijke hoeveelheid stemmen is om zinvolle gegevens weer te geven. Deze visuele weergaven tonen de resultaten van gebruikerspeilingen in de loop van de tijd en bieden een belangrijke indicatie van sentimenttrends.

Gevoel over tijd (jaarlijks)

Groei

Snelle groei vergeleken met andere beroepen

Het aantal 'Insurance Sales Agents' vacatures zal naar verwachting stijgen met 6,1% tegen 2033

Totale werkgelegenheid en geschatte vacatures

* Gegevens van het Bureau of Labor Statistics voor de periode tussen 2021 en 2031
Bijgewerkte prognoses zijn verschuldigd 09-2024.

Lonen

Gemiddeld betaald in vergelijking met andere beroepen

In 2023 was het mediane jaarloon voor 'Insurance Sales Agents' $ 59.080, of $ 28 per uur

'Insurance Sales Agents' werden 22,9% hoger betaald dan het nationale mediane loon, dat op $ 48.060 stond.

Lonen in de loop van de tijd

* Gegevens van het Bureau voor Arbeidsstatistieken

Volume

Aanzienlijk groter aanbod van werkgelegenheden vergeleken met andere beroepen

Vanaf 2023 waren er 457.510 mensen in dienst als 'Insurance Sales Agents' binnen de Verenigde Staten.

Dit vertegenwoordigt ongeveer 0,30% van de werkende bevolking in het hele land.

Anders gezegd, ongeveer 1 op de 331 mensen is werkzaam als 'Insurance Sales Agents'.

Functieomschrijving

Verkoop levens-, eigendoms-, ongevallen-, gezondheids-, auto- of andere soorten verzekeringen. Kan klanten doorverwijzen naar onafhankelijke makelaars, werken als een onafhankelijke makelaar, of in dienst zijn bij een verzekeringsmaatschappij.

SOC Code: 41-3021.00

Middelen

Zoek naar banen in uw lokale omgeving

Als u overweegt een nieuwe carrière te beginnen, of van baan wilt veranderen, hebben we een handige zoektool voor banen gemaakt die u mogelijk helpt bij het vinden van die perfecte nieuwe functie.

Zoek naar banen in uw lokale omgeving

Opmerkingen

Leave a comment

Nicolas Luksetich (Onzeker) 4 months ago
There are certain details about commercial and private lines that require a humans touch. Most could be put together by AI though
0 0 Reply
Anon (Zeer waarschijnlijk) 11 months ago
I voted highly likely. The timeframe is 20 years, and AI tools are already highly advanced, and will continue to grow. Voice automation is a thing, and will improve to the point where you won't even know you're talking to AI bot. AI can contextualize the information. As for claims handling, I think that will be taken over by AI, which removes the need for an agent advocate. An AI can read through a policy and fully understand whether or not coverage exists for a claim. If there is a grey area of coverage, it can be sent to a legal department to reword the policy forms for future policies. Additionally, in grey area situations, the AI bot can calculate the risk of lawsuit, and risk of losing, risk of over all cost of denying and fighting a claim, vs settling with the insured - all in an instant.

As for the insurance agent, AI can easily understand and sell a product. One could argue that using AI will increase the risk of E&O. That may be true, but 1) AI will improve and the E&O risk will greatly decrease and 2) The cost to use AI, and pay the salary of one or a team of specialists to maintain the AI will save so much on employee salaries (AI +3-5 people can easily replace 100+ agent departments) that the cost for E&O deductibles and possible E&O premium increase is outweighed. 100 agents making $60k/year = $6,000,000 saved.
0 0 Reply
Jeff (Matig) 11 months ago
This was a year ago, but as "training" we worked with an AI that pretended to be a customer. It was very rudimentary, but with the advances of AI we have seen in the last year I could see it learning what good sales agents do and replicate it. So within 10 years it could basically replicate what a standard agent does or possibly exceed them since it doesn't have feelings and will push the product harder than humans will.
0 0 Reply
Logan (Zeer waarschijnlijk) 1 year ago
The questions, at least in my country, asked by the insurance agents are the same. How much do you want when you die, is this amount enough for your future offspring, how much is enough to not burden your family, you should get X times your salary for this plan.

An AI can do the same. Key in custom values and voila, a carefully crafted plan will be ready for you. And it may even analyse existing clients and suggest the most suitable plan for you. If you feel unsure about their decision and have more spare cash, you can raise the premium and decide to insure more.
0 0 Reply
Antonio (Laag) 2 years ago
I voted for a small chance. However, as an agent, while what we do in a nutshell may be easy, you lose that human aspect. A robot will have no empathy. I have sold policies where I helped people get certain discounts that a robot wouldn't have done for them.

Also, yes, you can buy insurance online, but I can't tell you how many times I had to go fix a problem or amend a policy because someone did it online and did not fully understand what they were doing.
0 0 Reply
Jim 3 years ago
As an Independent Agent, I have had people leave us and go to a "direct" company for a small savings. It's funny though, when they are involved in an accident or any other type of claim they will call me for help dealing with their company. There is not anyone advocating for them or getting them through the claim process. It is then they understand the need for an agent and usually come back.

Claims are the product we sell. No claims, no need for an Agent or a company for that matter
0 0 Reply
Alejandro Lechere 3 years ago
Esto tiene que ver mucho en donde se desarrolle la practica, en lugares donde la digitalizacion sea cultural, va a avanzar. Hay que ver como impacta en la decision de los clientes, lo que se contrata es algo intangible y es un servicio a futuro a cumplir el contrato. Por lo que la base puntual de esto es la confianza, la solidez de la empresa(imagen), pero lo sociocultural tiene que ver, la infraestructura de cada pais, tambien, si bien puede avanzar en paises desarrollados, puede que tenga trabas por otro lados. La globalizacion genera cambios de por si, pero su entorno juega en contra. Si bien la calidad de servicio personal generalmente es de mejor calidad, no por eso, va a ser mas rapida y eficiente. Creo que pueden ser mejores socios, pero a corto plazo, lo veo mas dificil que a largo.

Si nos quedan 20 años, me quedo contento, con eso. Los que amamos dicha actividad, cuando las empresas en este caso de Argentina, dan un paso para lo virtual, se encuentran con muchos problemas. (El fraude es uno de los principales costos) como tambien el costo operartivo (comisiones estructura de las empresas), pero si la ecuacion es bajar el costo, y esto hace subir los fraudes, no veo la ventaja.

0 0 Reply
Bobby G (Laag) 4 years ago
People can buy any type of insurance without an agent now. And yet, agents still make a living. Unless companies no longer employ or accept applications from agents, there will still be sales by agents
0 0 Reply
Keith 4 years ago
There will always be top companies willing to commission a good insurance broker. The companies that hire on salary and our captive are the ones who make the shift. These companies know good sales people drive revenue. We can use quote tech and other tech to service more people. AI will never sale as fast as a person because? There is zero emotion. As long as you have the ability to get a license, use tech to your advantage, and buy leads you’re safe for decades.
0 0 Reply
Dr. Yo (Geen kans) 4 years ago
You cannot sell life insurance on advertisement, it creates anti-selection. Mostly those who are more likely to die will respond to the sales pitch. The sales PERSON should convince someone who absolutely don't need this product and will never use it for themselves to buy it - then it becomes profitable. The process is too emotional to outsource it to AI.
0 0 Reply
Luiz Antonio (Geen kans) 4 years ago
I voted 'no chance' because insurance sales are very personal and based on trust. The A.I. can have all the technical knowledge to do this. But it can't physically meet with clients, take them to dinner, understand their personal problems, and earn their trust. Although i believe A.I. will help increase insurance sales in the next two decades.
0 0 Reply
Bobby G 4 years ago
There are those people (Group 1) who can understand things by reading and doing for themselves and there are people (Group 2) who hate reading or who read stuff and become more confused or still cannot use what they've read to make a decision. AI will not be able to help many in the 2nd group, so therefore, these people will need someone to explain it to them. Currently, anyone can get any type of insurance on their own, either by using the internet or calling directly to the company and use the company's in house agent. And yet, independent agents are still able to make a living. So, therefore, unless agents will no longer be employed and companies only employ AI, agents, especially independent agents, will still exist. So, Luiz, there will be some loss of Group 2 to AI (maybe 25%), you are partially correct
0 0 Reply
Swifty 5 years ago
Auto, Home, and Travel insurance is already being automated now in Poland. The Polish company LINK4 is already doing it. https://www.link4.pl/o-link4/about-link4

And like another has said referring to Amazon, all Amazon has to do is optimize Alexa so she can talk back to you and ask you all the questions needed to properly underwrite and sell you your policy.

Another company to take a look at is Spixii
https://www.spixii.com/infobot
0 0 Reply
Billy Johnson (Laag) 5 years ago
Robots won't be bright enough to go through the nuances of a specific and unique risk like insurance is. Perhaps for something simple like auto insurance but not for home, business, life, health, etc that is far more personalized to each person walking through the door.
0 0 Reply
Chris Duncan 5 years ago
Where insurance is a commodity with more standardized coverages (BOP, Work Comp, Life, retail property, auto) for personal lines and small commercial, the disintermediation of insurance agents and brokers is already happening in the insurtech world. However, for complex risks and custom insurance for large companies (complex property, liability, product liability, D&O, even "advisor" driven complex decisions like health insurance), it'll be a while. So, rapid change in internet enabled sales and service of routine solutions, but more custom work, still needs advisors.
0 0 Reply
Bill Purmort 5 years ago
The world of risk transfer will continue to be very complex and a artificial replacement may add to the transaction but will never replace it
0 0 Reply
Your Friendly Neighbourhood Insurance Broker 5 years ago
Until it does - look at these online insurer's and brokers. Policy Genius in the US offers quotes across many P&C and Life companies already.

As a client who has unlimited access to information and reviews online, I can spend an hour's time myself comparing 10+ different companies from my couch and never have to step into an insurance office (which face it is extremely dull no matter who you are).

Big players like TD are disrupting the market in Canada with their self serve online P&C products and another of the big ones in Canada, The Co-operators, is pushing their group plans which are completely self serve and offer steep discounts compared to their regular products (I've seen less than half price). Which they can do because they cut out the middle man.

Amazon has also been speculated to start dabbling in the insurance business. Bezos is a conqueror and once he comes for you, it is only a matter of time.

When companies stand to save millions of dollars per year, it will happen. And it will happen quicker than you think.
0 0 Reply
Bobby G 4 years ago
"Your Friendly Neighbourhood Insurance Broker says When companies stand to save millions of dollars per year, it will happen". As if AI doesn't cost money to program. And the changes in prices and regulations have to be programmed in every year. The savings won't be that much. This is not a repetitive procedure like building a car. I think you are oversimplifying the sale of insurance. With competing products, people need to understand or some want someone to simplify it and tell them what is best for them. AI cannot do that.
0 0 Reply
Bryan Cryznski 5 years ago
You're acting like you're smart enough to pick coverage for yourself. Never has there been an industry where people know less than insurance. It's people like you who think you can do it from your couch that are always crying when they have a loss because they chose cheap over adequate coverage on the internet and you'll be complaining to a robot/call center that doesn't care.
0 0 Reply
Ryan 4 years ago
"Never has there been an industry where people know less than insurance." Bold statement there, Bryan. I'd hazard to say that the medical field, in many instances, are far and away more complicated and 'less known' than insurance. But, sure. Let's work with that premise.

Have you worked with AI and algorithms and machine learning before? I can tell you that personal insurance, with as many different factors that there can be, there certainly are solutions for all of the coverage requirements and options. If an insurance company can build in redundancy-proof errors, it wouldn't be a stretch at all to implement those redundancy-proofs to an online, automated, customer-driven platform to purchase insurance.

As soon as a client enters their license number, we can extract their license history, claims history, insurance history and conviction history. AI could easily take out the important information and calculate accordingly.

Who cares if they choose the insurance that isn't the best for them? Is that your personal responsibility to worry about what everyone chooses for every aspect of their life? Caveat emptor. Google it. Read it. Understand it.

There are many, many industries that take advantage of general ignorance. You've made a straw man argument that does not stand up to actual scrutiny. Brokers are on the way out. It is a matter of time, not opinion.
0 0 Reply
Ryan M. 4 years ago
"Brokers are on the way out. It is a matter of time, not opinion." Bold statement there, Ryan. You've identified real threats to a broker's career choice without proving the certainty of your conclusion. I believe a decent term for someone who emphatically predicts the future without appropriate evidence is "fraud". AI will be a viable option for purchasing insurance, and so will brokers. Who will win out? I don't know, but it's a very big space with more than enough room for robots and humans alike.
0 0 Reply

Laat een reactie achter over dit beroep

Deze site wordt beschermd door reCAPTCHA en het Privacybeleid en de Servicevoorwaarden van Google zijn van toepassing.