Firefighters

17%
Vote
Comments (4)

Will "Firefighters" be replaced by AI & Robots?

There is very little chance of this occupation being replaced by robots/AI. This is further validated by our poll, which suggests a 24% chance of automation within the next 2 decades.

Automation Risk Level

No worries

or 17% probability of automation

Projected Growth

5%

by 2024

Median Annual Wage

$48,030

or $23.09 hourly

People Employed

315,910

as of 2016

Compare
Most likely
Least likely

How this compares with other jobs: 200 out of 706

Cast Your Vote




How likely do you think this occupation will be taken over by robots/AI within the next 20 years?

Job description

Control and extinguish fires or respond to emergency situations where life, property, or the environment is at risk. Duties may include fire prevention, emergency medical service, hazardous material response, search and rescue, and disaster assistance.

SOC Code: 33-2011

If you're thinking of starting a new career, or looking to change jobs, we've created a handy job search tool which might just help you land that perfect new role.

Search jobs in your local area

Comments

Firefighter manager says
Wake up and smell the coffee technology is already impacting on the job ever heard of Boston Robotics https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=boston+robotics+youtube&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&hl=en-gb&client=safari
Mar 09, 2020 at 06:44 PM
An Actual Firefighter says
If you think this will happen you’re f**king stupid.
Oct 18, 2019 at 12:32 AM
Em (No chance) says
You can't send a robot into a flaming building and expect it to adapt to its surroundings.
Oct 03, 2019 at 03:37 PM
Alvaro says
I can´t disagree more with this. Robots can be fireproof and humans are very affected by fire.
May 09, 2019 at 12:01 PM
Alvarado says
Problem I see with automation, still would be fun to attempt. Is that every building is different and the environment is changing, would also need to be able to feel and hear materials and their strengths. A lot of little details to automate, so extremely difficult. In terms of robots being physically more capable I'd say of course, but at same time likely heavier so would not work as well in a weaken building. But most likely I can see them being most useful being piloted remotely by firemen, and generally mostly when the environment is already rated as unpassable, so at the point where no firemen would enter the building anymore due to safety concerns. But in a potentially weakened building but safe enough to enter building, I could see humans having an advantage due to our lighter bodies.
Dec 18, 2019 at 02:37 AM

Leave a reply about this occupation

Your email address will not be published.
Comment
 
Name
 
Email (optional)
Copied